Applying the Intention-Action Framework to Specialty Referrals

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of California, Los Angeles

About this trial

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating an EHR-embedded behavioral intervention intended to reduce low-value specialty referrals in cardiology, pulmonology, and gastroenterology. The intervention is designed to (1) strengthen physicians' intentions to avoid low-value specialty referrals at the point of encounter by presenting criteria for high-value referrals and informing physicians that referral decisions may be reviewed and (2) support follow-through on these intentions by modifying the referral process through structured checklist prompts embedded within the referral workflow.

The primary hypothesis is that physicians exposed to the intervention will demonstrate lower rates of low-value cardiology, pulmonology, and gastroenterology referrals compared with physicians exposed to the arm where the order composer allows physicians to place referrals with minimal decision support.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

UCLA Health physicians who have made at least one specialty referral to cardiology, pulmonology, or gastroenterology for patients in UCLA Health primary care registry during July-December 2025

Disqualifiers

Physicians who are no longer actively practicing at UCLA Health as of July 1, 2026

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Information provision

    Behavioral

    The order composer displays high-value criteria developed by UCLA Health using professional society guidelines and expert consensus from clinical leadership.

  • Auditing

    Behavioral

    The order composer notifies physicians that their referral decisions may be subject to review.

  • Checklist

    Behavioral

    The order composer includes cascading checkboxes that prompt physicians to confirm that referral criteria are met before submitting a referral. Physicians must actively indicate whether the patient meets referral criteria before submitting a referral. Physicians who determine that a referral remains clinically appropriate despite the patient not meeting listed criteria may select an option indicating that none of the listed criteria apply and provide a brief free-text explanation for proceeding with the referral.

Treatment groups

1,600 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Arm 1: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Arm 2: Information + ReviewExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: Arm 3: Information + Review + ChecklistExperimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Physician-level rate of low-value specialty referrals per 100 referral relevant encounters

A low-value referral is defined as a referral to one of the three target specialty divisions placed during a referral-relevant encounter that does not meet the pre-specified referral criteria developed by UCLA Health division chiefs for the corresponding medical condition. The primary outcome is calculated as the number of low-value referrals divided by the number of referral-relevant encounters, multiplied by 100, aggregated at the physician level.

Time frame
During 6-month intervention period

Secondary outcomes

1

Rate of total specialty referrals in the target divisions per 100 referral-relevant encounters

Number of referrals to the targeted specialty divisions per 100 referral-relevant encounters.

Time frame
During 6-month intervention period
2

Rate of high-value specialty referrals in the target divisions per 100 referral-relevant encounters

Number of referrals meeting pre-specified high-value criteria to the targeted specialty divisions per 100 referral-relevant encounters.

Time frame
During 6-month intervention period
3

Rate of unplanned hospital admissions (within 30 days) per 100 referral-relevant encounters

Number of unplanned hospital admissions occurring within 30 days of a referral-relevant encounter per 100 referral-relevant encounters.

Time frame
During 6-month intervention period
4

Rate of emergency department visits (within 30 days) per 100 referral-relevant encounters

Number of emergency department visits occurring within 30 days of a referral-relevant encounter per 100 referral-relevant encounters.

Time frame
During 6-month intervention period

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of California, Los Angeles

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: