Cardiology

10

Review clinical trials related to Cardiology. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Applying the Intention-Action Framework to Specialty Referrals

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating an EHR-embedded behavioral intervention intended to reduce low-value specialty referrals in cardiology, pulmonology, and gastroenterology. The intervention is designed to (1) strengthen physicians' intentions to avoid low-value specialty referrals at the point of encounter by presenting criteria for high-value referrals and informing physicians that referral decisions may be reviewed and (2) support follow-through on these intentions by modifying the referral process through structured checklist prompts embedded within the referral workflow. The primary hypothesis is that physicians exposed to the intervention will demonstrate lower rates of low-value cardiology, pulmonology, and gastroenterology referrals compared with physicians exposed to the arm where the order composer allows physicians to place referrals with minimal decision support.

Participants needed: 1,600
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University of California, Los AngelesUpdated: Jun 26, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

UCLA Health physicians who have made at least one specialty referral to cardiolo...

Physicians who are no longer actively practicing at UCLA Health as of July 1, 20...

Status: Not yet recruiting

PULSE - Patient Understanding and Learning Through Structured Education - Effectiveness and Implementation of Patient Education Videos in a New Pediatric Cardiology Clinic: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

This study is looking at whether short educational videos shown during pediatric cardiology visits can help families better understand their child's condition while also making clinic visits run more efficiently. Families coming to a pediatric cardiology clinic may watch short videos related to why they are there (for example: chest pain, heart murmurs, fainting, sports clearance, or Kawasaki disease). The videos are meant to explain common heart-related conditions and answer questions before the doctor comes into the room. Researchers want to see if this: * helps parents and patients learn more, * improves satisfaction with the visit, * helps families feel more involved in decisions, * and reduces the amount of time doctors spend repeating the same explanations. How the study works: One clinic site in San Antonio, TX will start using the videos at different times. Researchers will compare clinic visits before and after the videos are introduced. Who is included: Children being seen in pediatric cardiology clinics and their caregivers. Pregnant women referred for fetal heart evaluations may also be included. What information is collected: Clinic timing information (such as wait times and doctor visit length), Satisfaction surveys, Optional knowledge questionnaires, Basic medical record information needed for the study. Risk level: The study is considered "minimal risk." Patients are still getting normal medical care. No drugs, devices, or experimental treatments are being tested. Privacy protections: Data will be stored on secure hospital systems. Researchers plan to remove identifying information when analyzing results. Medical record numbers are only temporarily used to connect survey data with clinic data. Why the study matters: The clinic hopes the videos can make visits less stressful, improve understanding for families, and help doctors spend more time on personalized care instead of repeating the same explanations over and over. It may also help clinics work more efficiently and reduce delays.

Participants needed: 300
Trial details
Age: Up to 18Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Driscoll Children's HospitalUpdated: May 18, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Not listed

Status: Recruiting

Safe and Explainable AI

While current AI technology is suitable for automating some repetitive clinical tasks, technical challenges remain in solving critical and gainful problems in the domains of patient and disease management. The proposed research seeks to address issues in medical AI, such as integrating medical knowledge effectively, making AI recommendations explainable to clinicians, and establishing safety guarantees.

Participants needed: 300,000
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineUpdated: Feb 25, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Not listed

Status: Not yet recruiting

Dual Anti-Platelet Optimized Stent for High Bleeding Risk Patient

High risk of bleeding (HBR) is a determining factor for the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Recent studies have shown that the use of one-month DAPT is beneficial in terms of ischemic as well as hemorrhagic events, particularly in HBR patients, compared with longer DAPT. European guidelines therefore authorize one-month DAPT in HBR patients presenting even an acute coronary syndrome. The HT Supreme Drug Coated Coronary Stent System (HT Supreme DES) is designed to promote reendothelialization as quickly as possible. That's why the stent is called "HT" Supreme, with "HT" standing for "Healing Targeted", enabling a DAPT of just 1 month in all-comers HBR patients. Thanks to these features, the investigators aim to demonstrate ischemic and hemorrhagic complication rates lower than those found in the literature with other stent.

Participants needed: 1,200
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: University Hospital, GrenobleUpdated: Aug 24, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patient aged ≥ 18 years [+5]

Estimated lifespan <1 year, [+5]

Status: Recruiting

High-Sensitivity Troponin I in Addition to Guideline-Based Care in EMS

The TIGER study is a study investigating the utlility of a point-of-care blood analyse of Troponin I to help identify patients with heart attacks in the prehospital emergency care. The study is conducted within the ambulance services of Region Stockholm and compares standard medical care with and without the addition of this quick test. Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for ambulance dispatch, but currently only about one-third of heart attacks are detected before arriving at the hospital-mainly through ECG. The remaining two-thirds are not identified until after further testing at the emergency department. The TIGER study aims to improve early diagnosis by using a high-sensitivity, point-of-care Troponin I test already in the prehospital phase. The study is a randomized controlled trial, where participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives standard emergency care along with the rapid Troponin I test in the ambulance. The other group receives standard care without the test. The goal is to evaluate whether the use of Troponin I testing leads to faster and more accurate identification of heart attacks, ultimately improving patient outcomes. In total, about 1,419 adult patients with chest pain or suspected heart attack will participate. The primary outcome being measured is the time from first medical contact to PCI (balloon angioplasty). Secondary outcomes include time spent in different parts of care, hospital length of stay, the occurrence of serious events (such as heart attack, stroke, or death), and the diagnostic accuracy of the test. The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and includes safety monitoring through an interim analysis after the first 150 patients. Test results from the Troponin I analysis are clearly marked as part of the research study and should be interpreted by the responsible physician alongside other clinical findings.

Participants needed: 1,419
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Karolinska InstitutetUpdated: Jul 2, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Chestpain / discomfort and/or [+1]

Patients suffering from a trauma and conveyed to the trauma level 1 hospital. [+3]

Status: Recruiting

Large Language Models To Improve the Quality of Care of Cardiology Patients

This study evaluates the impact of large language models (LLMs) versus traditional decision support tools on clinical decision-making in cardiology. General cardiologists will be randomized to manage real patient cases from a cardiovascular genetic cardiomyopathy clinic, with or without AI assistance. Each case will be assessed by two cardiologists, and their responses will be graded by blinded subspecialty experts using a standardized evaluation rubric.

Participants needed: 12
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Stanford UniversityUpdated: May 15, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Board certified or board eligible Cardiologist.

Not currently practicing clinically

Status: Recruiting

Utility of Gene Test Analysis for Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment of Patients With Genetic Arrhythmic Heart Disease: the ARRHYTHMIC GENE-HEART

The goal of this observational study is to enroll all patients evaluated at the specialized Cardiogenetic Center within the Cardiology Department of the University of Ferrara, Italy. The primary aim of the registry is to collect comprehensive clinical, genetic, and electrophysiological data from individuals with suspected or confirmed arrhythmogenic conditions. By systematically documenting patient demographics, family history, clinical presentations, diagnostic findings, and treatment outcomes, the registry seeks to enhance our understanding of the genetic basis and clinical implications of genetically driven arrhythmias and systemic syndromes. This registry will facilitate long-term follow-up of enrolled patients to assess the natural history of arrhythmogenic disorders and the effectiveness of various therapeutic interventions. Additionally, it aims to identify potential risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, such as sudden cardiac death or major arrhythmic events.

Participants needed: 200
Trial details
Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: University Hospital of FerraraUpdated: Mar 27, 2025Locations: 1Duration: 10 Years
Eligibility criteria

Patients evaluated at the Cardiogenetic Center of the University of Ferrara in F... [+1]

Refuse to provide informed consents [+1]

Status: Recruiting

Efficacy and Safety of SPC1001 in Patients With Essential Hypertension

\- Objective: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the fixed-dose triple combination therapy (SPC1001) of candesartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in adult patients with essential hypertension compared to dual-component therapies of each ingredient for 8 weeks. Additionally, it seeks to confirm the contribution of each component at low doses. \- Inclusion Criteria: Men and women aged 19 to 75 years whose blood pressure measured at the screening visit meets the following criteria. \- Exclusion Criteria: Patients whose blood pressure measured at the screening and randomization visits meets the criteria of MSSBP ≥180 mmHg or MSDBP ≥110 mmHg, among other conditions. \- Methods: This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2b clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational drug after 8 weeks of administration. Screening assessments will be conducted within 4 weeks prior to randomization, and patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria at the screening visit will be enrolled in the study after providing informed consent. These participants will undergo a 2-week run-in period during which they will take a placebo and participate in a lifestyle modification program.

Participants needed: 252
Trial details
Phase: Phase 2Age: 19-75Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.Updated: Feb 14, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Men and women aged 19 to 75 years whose blood pressure measured at the screening...

Patients whose blood pressure measured at the screening and randomization visits...

Status: Not yet recruiting

Screening Of CoRonary ArTEry diSease

This study is a randomized trial with the objective of comparing the cost-effectiveness of the 2 recommended strategies: CCTA vs functional tests, allowing the evaluation of the quality of life of these patients in relation to the health resources used. In symptomatic patients with an intermediate probability of having stable CAD, i.e., whose pretest or clinical probability does not allow the elimination of the disease, and in patients without anginal symptoms for low levels of exercise who do not respond to medical therapy, in France, the diagnostic care pathways have become mature enough to set up a pragmatic prospective randomized trial with the objective of comparing the cost-effectiveness of the 2 recommended strategies: CCTA vs. Probabilistic medico-economic reasoning makes it possible to establish this two-way hypothesis more easily than in clinical research without the need to impose the superiority of one of the strategies.

Participants needed: 800
Trial details
Age: 18-75Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University Hospital, GrenobleUpdated: May 11, 2022
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18 to 75 years [+3]

Pre-test probability "low" < 5% or 5-15% without additive pejorative factors [+8]

Status: Recruiting

France PCI Registry : National Observatory of Interventional Cardiology

Rigorous clinical practice assessment is a key factor to improve patient's care and prognosis in interventional cardiology (IC). A multicentric IC observational study (CRAC), fully integrated to usual coronary activity report software, started in Centre Val de Loire (CVL) region in 2014. CRAC observatory was conduced on five IC CathLab of CVL region. Quality of collected data is regularly evaluated and allowed building an exhaustive, and reliable database. This solution could easily be developed in other French regions.

Participants needed: 40,000
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Club Régional des Angioplasticiens de la région CentreUpdated: Apr 7, 2022Locations: 15
Eligibility criteria

Age =>18 years at enrollment [+1]

Patient who didn't want to participated