Hypotension And Shock

This pilot randomized clinical trial compares dopamine and norepinephrine as first-line vasoactive therapies in term and late preterm neonates with pulmonary hypertension associated with hypoxemic respiratory failure and systemic hypotension. Systemic hypotension is a common and clinically significant complication of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) and frequently requires vasopressor support to maintain adequate systemic perfusion. Dopamine is commonly used in this setting; however, prior animal experimental and clinical data suggest it may increase pulmonary vascular resistance, potentially worsening right ventricular afterload and hypoxemia. Norepinephrine may preferentially increase systemic vascular resistance with less effect on the pulmonary circulation. This study evaluates short-term hemodynamic and oxygenation responses following initiation of dopamine or norepinephrine.

The goal of this pragmatic, multi-center, superiority, randomized clinical trial is to compare early treatment with peripheral (through a vein) infused noradrenaline (a natural hormone that increases blood pressure) with fluid only therapy in patients with hypotensive and shock in the Danish and Swedish Emergency Departments (ED). The main questions it aims to answer are: If early initiated noradrenaline in non-bleeding hypotensive patients presenting in the ED can * Improve time to shock control. * Reduce the need for ICU admittance. * Decrease mortality. Participants will be included by the clinical staff and treated urgently with either noradrenaline or usual treatment during their Emergency Department stay. After completion of the treatment in the Emergency Department, patient data will be extracted from the bed-side measurements, electronic health records and national registers. Patients will be contacted by the research staff 1 year after study inclusion to answer brief questions about their daily physical function and ability to care for themselves. Researchers will compare with patients receiving fluid therapy only, as this is the usual standard of care in Danish and Swedish Emergency Departments.

What is this study about? We are studying whether the Pleth Variability Index (PVI)-a simple, non-invasive measurement from a pulse oximeter-can help predict low blood pressure (hypotension) during routine maintenance hemodialysis. Low blood pressure during dialysis is a common and potentially serious complication. Our goal is to find out if monitoring PVI can help identify patients at risk, so that early action can be taken. Who can join? Adults aged 18 to 80 years. Patients who have been receiving maintenance hemodialysis regularly for more than 3 months. Those who are willing and able to participate and sign an informed consent form. Who cannot join? Patients with severe heart rhythm problems, severe peripheral circulation problems, or swelling that makes PVI measurement unreliable. Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Patients allergic to the dialysis filter or unable to cooperate with the study procedures. What will happen during the study? PVI Measurement: Your PVI will be checked with a simple fingertip device before starting dialysis and again 30 minutes after dialysis begins. Blood Pressure Monitoring: Your blood pressure will be closely watched throughout the dialysis session. Data Collection: Information about your age, medical history, medications, lab results, dialysis settings, and other standard measurements will be recorded. What are the benefits and risks? Benefits: By identifying patients at higher risk for low blood pressure during dialysis, the study may lead to safer and more comfortable dialysis treatment in the future. Risks: All measurements used in this study are safe and non-invasive, with no extra risk compared to routine care. Your Rights and Safety Participation is completely voluntary-you may leave the study at any time without affecting your medical care. The study has been reviewed and approved by the hospital's ethics committee. Your privacy and personal data will be strictly protected.

Up to today, inadequate evidences and knowledge exist about the best prehospital management of hypotensive trauma patients and its clinical consequence on the in-hospital recovery and mortality. Also new emerging therapies such as prehospital blood transfusion and REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) are lacking strong evidences in, eventually, reducing hospital mortality and improving outcomes. Moreover, prehospital emergency medicine is throughout Italy an heterogeneous system that has no unique standard operating procedures and, even among HEMS (helicopter emergency medical service), management and therapies on complex trauma patients may vary upon local policies. With this study we aim to enroll hypotensive trauma patients and study factors of prehospital rescue that can be associated with in-hospital mortality and recovery, eventually even with hospital outcome. For each patients data as demographic, kind of trauma (mechanism, injury scores), therapies and maneuvers will be recorded and then analyzed in comparison with in-hospital data such as need for transfusion, ABG parameters, length of stay (in-ward and ICU), need of therapies like invasive ventilation and renal replacement therapy, recovery and outcome