Low Back Pain

Low back pain is one of the most common health issues worldwide, and in most cases, this pain is nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP). NSLBP is characterized by the inability to determine the real source of the pain and commonly presents with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the muscles related to the lumbar region. One of the most widely used techniques for treating NSLBP by targeting MTrPs is dry needling (DN), a technique that involves inserting a needle to produce a mechanical effect capable of "deactivating" the MTrP and thereby alleviating its symptoms. However, some studies have concluded that other techniques are more effective than DN, such as percutaneous electrolysis (PE). When using the PE technique, it appears that adding a galvanic current enhances the effects of DN. Nonetheless, this poses a greater risk to the patient, as the galvanic current could damage nervous tissue if it comes into contact. For this reason, it is proposed to investigate whether other physical agents that are not electrical could enhance the effect of DN without increasing its risk. This is the case for vibration, a stimulus that has already been used successfully for the treatment of MTrPs, allowing us to investigate whether adding vibration to DN introduces therapeutic capabilities that: * Maintain or increase the effectiveness of DN in terms of pain and functional capacity. * Do not add risks for the patient, unlike PE. * Are less painful than DN and cause less post-needling pain than that generated after successive needle insertions with DN. Emphasizing these adverse effects is necessary since most clinical trials do not report these variables, which is fundamental for describing the safety of invasive techniques. Following this idea, the present project will analyze a new invasive therapy for the treatment of MTrPs: dry needling with vibratory stimulus (DN+V), for which the following hypotheses are proposed: * DN+V, instead of using an electrical stimulus like PE that could cause damage to some tissues, will apply vibration to the DN needles to increase the mechanical stimulus exerted on the MTrP, expecting greater benefits in terms of pain, functional capacity, muscle strength, and other variables of interest in individuals with NSLBP, and possibly requiring less treatment time than DN. * In DN, the repeated insertions and withdrawals of the needle in the MTrP provoke a hemorrhagic and inflammatory reaction that translates into hypersensitivity and microscopic tissue injury in the muscle, causing pain during treatment and post-needling pain for the following 24-32 hours. Another study showed that PE caused less post-needling pain than DN, which may be due to the fact that, unlike DN, it is common in PE to only perform a single puncture with each needle and not mobilize them. * The methodology for DN+V will be the same as for PE, with a single puncture and no needle manipulation, so it is expected that DN+V, being less invasive than DN, will reduce pain during treatment and post-needling pain compared to that generated by DN. There are studies that support this hypothesis, concluding that needle manipulation in DN produces greater post-needling pain than DN without needle manipulation.

This observational study aims to examine the relationship between the percentage of limb loss and functional outcomes in individuals with unilateral upper limb amputation. Upper limb amputation can affect posture, balance control, pain levels, daily living activities, hand function, and reaction time. However, limited research has investigated how the amount of limb loss influences these outcomes. Participants between 18 and 65 years of age who use a myoelectric or bionic prosthesis will undergo a series of assessments. These assessments include measurements of postural control using a force platform, posture analysis, evaluation of neck and low back pain using a visual analog scale, daily living activities using a validated questionnaire, hand dexterity using the Box and Block Test, and reaction time using a visual stimulus device. The study does not involve any intervention or treatment. All evaluations will be performed during a single assessment session. The results of this study may help improve rehabilitation planning and provide better understanding of functional changes associated with different levels of limb loss in people with upper limb amputation.

The JAPET.W+ medical device is a new dynamic distraction support system. It could be considered as a new solution in the therapeutic arsenal for managing common low back pain. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of this device among the two targeted populations during daily use. Each patient will be asked to estimate the intensity of their low back pain several times during the clinical investigation. Our main hypothesis is a reduction in low back pain while wearing the device. The secondary hypothesis is a decrease in activity limitations, an increase in participation, an improvement in quality of life, and a reduction in healthcare product and medication consumption.

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder associated with substantial disability and reduced quality of life. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used to identify structural spinal abnormalities, the relationship between MRI findings and treatment outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective study aims to evaluate whether the effectiveness of a standardized physical therapy program differs according to baseline lumbar MRI findings. Medical records of 120 patients with low back pain who underwent lumbar MRI and completed 15 sessions of physical therapy between January 2022 and February 2026 will be reviewed. Patients will be classified into three MRI-based groups: disc herniation, disc degeneration, and non-specific MRI findings. Treatment outcomes will be assessed using changes in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores before and after treatment. The findings may contribute to identifying patient subgroups that respond differently to conservative treatment and support more individualized rehabilitation strategies.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of early mobilization alone versus early mobilization combined with electrical stimulation on functional recovery following lumbar disc herniation surgery. Lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of low back pain and functional limitation, significantly affecting quality of life. Although surgical intervention is effective in patients who do not respond to conservative treatment, optimal postoperative recovery largely depends on appropriate rehabilitation strategies. Early mobilization is widely recommended to prevent complications, preserve muscle function, and facilitate return to daily activities. In addition, electrical stimulation modalities such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) have been increasingly integrated into rehabilitation programs to enhance pain control, muscle activation, and neuromuscular re-education. In this study, a total of 60 participants who have undergone primary lumbar disc herniation surgery will be randomly assigned into two groups. The first group will receive an early mobilization program alone, while the second group will receive early mobilization combined with electrical stimulation (NMES/TENS). The intervention period will last 6 to 8 weeks, with sessions conducted three times per week. Primary outcomes include functional disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include functional mobility assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, walking speed assessed by the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and muscle strength evaluated using manual muscle testing (MMT). The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of evidence-based postoperative rehabilitation protocols and to clarify the clinical effectiveness of electrical stimulation in patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery

Our study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound in the management of low back pain due to sacroiliitis. Sacroiliitis is the inflammation of a joint in the lowest part of the spin and it is one of the cause of low back; the diagnosis is essentially based on clinical examination and the confirmation of this diagnosis relies on a significant pain relief following an infiltration of local anesthetic in the joint. One of the potential treatment is to ablate the nerves which carry the painful stimuli from the joint to the central nervous system through; these nerves enter the spinal canal through the sacral foramina which are two series of four pairs of openings located on the sacrum, the triangular bone at the base of the spine. Traditionally, these nerves are ablated by the heat produced by radiofrequency or the cold produced by cryoablation; both techniques require percutaneous needle insertion in close proximity to the targeted nerves, posing potential discomfort and risk of infection for the patient. High intensity focused ultrasound delivered by the device Neurolyser XR uses ultrasounds which are converged to the targeted point thanks to a gel pad positioned on the back of the patient; this mechanism of action does not require sterile conditions as the skin is not pierced and the discomfort of patient is dramatically reduced during the procedure for there is non need to insert and move any needle to properly position it. The correct orientation of the ultrasound beam is guaranteed by the alignment of the targeting system of the device and the X-ray image. The lesion is produced only if there is a bone right under the focus of the ultrasound beam and this is a safety system which assures that no direct injuries of other structures (e.g., vessels, spinal root) can be caused. To date, Neurolyser XR has been extensively used to treat facet joint syndrome through the ablation of the medial branches. However, its application in sacroiliitis has not yet been as deeply investigated.

Low back pain, defined as pain located between the thoracolumbar junction and the lower gluteal fold, becomes chronic in 8% of patients. As the leading cause of disability worldwide, it has major individual and medico-economic consequences. Three-dimensional biomechanical analysis allows exploration of movement alterations related to low back pain. Although several parameters have already been studied (maximum joint range of motion (ROM), lumbopelvic rhythm, movement variability, gait), no consistent kinematic profile has emerged. Movement fluidity, assessed by the presence of jerks (brief movement disturbances), remains under-described despite its relevance in evaluating movement quality. Invistigators hypothesize that lumbar spine movement fluidity during flexion improves after a rehabilitation program and correlates with clinical response. This project stands out by exploring a rarely studied parameter (movement fluidity) and integrating it as a potential indicator for rehabilitation monitoring.

The main purpose of this study is to test the safety and efficacy of study drug for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292), which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of combining Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) with spinal manipulation for individuals suffering from chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive the combined intervention (neuroscience education plus spinal manipulation), while the control group will receive spinal manipulation alone. The primary goal of the researchers is to investigate whether this combined approach can help patients change their health locus of control-shifting from an external belief (that their health depends on external factors or clinicians) to an internal belief (that they have control over their own recovery and pain management). The total study period will last 3 months, consisting of 4 weeks of intervention followed by an 8-week follow-up period to assess long-term changes in pain intensity, disability, and health beliefs.

This randomized crossover pilot clinical trial evaluated the effects of two self-administered physiotherapy techniques in people with hamstring tightness and a history of non-specific low back pain. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. One sequence performed self-myofascial release using a foam roller first, followed by a one-month washout period, and then performed a self-administered neurodynamic sliding technique. The other sequence performed the neurodynamic sliding technique first, followed by a one-month washout period, and then performed the foam roller intervention. The main objective of the study was to compare the effects of both interventions on hamstring flexibility. Secondary outcomes included active knee extension range of motion, dynamic balance, pressure pain threshold, hamstring and gluteus maximus strength, and low back pain intensity.

Study to evaluate the effectiveness of time variant pulse (TVP)-SCS in patients with chronic pain using commercially approved Boston Scientific SCS Systems per local Instructions for use (IFU). In addition, to compile real-world clinical outcomes in subjects with chronic, intractable low back and/or leg pain.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to find the effectiveness of low load blood restriction training on improving hamstring muscle strength, alleviating pain and reducing functional disability in nonspecific low back pain patients

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether contextual effects created by observational learning can change pain relief and inflammation-related biological responses after spinal joint manipulation in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does positive, neutral, or negative observational learning change pain after spinal joint manipulation? Does it change disability, lumbar range of motion, stress, fear of movement, empathy, and treatment expectations? Does it change pressure pain threshold, lumbar tissue temperature, and blood markers related to inflammation, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-10 (IL-10)? The researchers will compare 3 groups: a positive expectation group, a neutral group, and a negative expectation group. Before the treatment, each participant will have a short interaction with a trained simulated patient. The simulated patient will present a positive, neutral, or negative experience with spinal manipulation, depending on group assignment. After this, all the participants will receive the same spinal joint manipulation procedure. The participants will: * be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 study groups, * complete baseline questionnaires and clinical tests before treatment, * take part in a brief observational learning session before manipulation, * receive 1 spinal joint manipulation treatment, * complete outcome measurements before treatment, about 60 minutes after treatment, and 24 hours after treatment, * provide blood samples for analysis of inflammation-related biomarkers. This study will include adults aged 18 to 65 years with chronic non-specific low back pain. The main outcome is pain intensity. Secondary outcomes include disability, stress, empathy, fear of movement, lumbar range of motion, tissue temperature, pressure pain threshold, and treatment expectations. Exploratory outcomes include blood biomarkers related to inflammation.

Patients with combat-related lower limb amputations frequently experience chronic low back pain during long-term rehabilitation and prosthetic use. Altered biomechanics, asymmetric loading, gait disturbances, and changes in spinal alignment after limb loss may contribute to the development of persistent back pain. The severity and characteristics of low back pain may vary according to the level of amputation. The LEVEL-BACK Study is a prospective observational study designed to evaluate the relationship between amputation level and chronic low back pain after combat-related amputation. Participants with different levels of lower limb amputation will undergo clinical assessment of low back pain intensity, functional limitations, prosthesis use, and rehabilitation outcomes during follow-up. The goal of the study is to improve understanding of how amputation level influences chronic low back pain after combat-related limb loss and to identify patients at increased risk for persistent spinal pain during rehabilitation.

Lumbar surgery is the most common treatment for chronic disabling low back pain with degenerative disc disease. There are few elements to objectively evaluate the improvement of the motor control after surgery and the motor adaptation capacities of the patients. The impact of lumbar surgery on complexity in this painful context has never been studied. Theoretically, the restriction of mobility imposed by lumbar surgery should limit the subject's adaptive capacities (of one or more lumbar segments) and thus reduce complexity. Nevertheless, improvement in pain intensity levels could allow the patient to find better motor adaptation capacities, necessary for a positive evolution in the long-term. The aim of this study was to investigate the evolution of gait complexity in chronic low back pain patients pre- and post-surgery. If surgery improves the adaptability of walking through an antalgic benefit exceeding the induced stiffness, the complexity of walking should be superior after surgery. This is a proof-of-concept study in which the study investigators hypothesize that measuring complexity by fractal analysis during a walking task will show the increase in gait complexity induced by lumbar surgery at 3 and 6 months after surgery.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy (OMT) to the usual medical care provided at the VA (usual VA care) improves treatment outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). OMT is a set of hands-on techniques a doctor uses to move a patient's muscles and joints which include stretching, gentle pressure, resistance and applying forces to specific areas of the body. This feasibility clinical trial aims to learn about the treatment effects (e.g., effect sizes) of adding OMT to the usual medical care provided at the VA (Usual VA Care) in individuals with LBP.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comparative effects of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) and active isolated stretch (AIS) techniques on reducing pain, improving range of motion, and decreasing functional disability in individuals with piriformis syndrome. A total of 40 participants will be recruited, aged 20-55 yrs, with confirmed piriformis syndrome. Participants will be randomized into two equal groups. Group A (post isometric relaxation) and Group B (active isolated stretch). Both groups will receive Conventional Therapy (Thermotherapy, Electrotherapy). Study variables include: * Independent Variable: Post Isometric Relaxation and Active Isolated Stretching. * Dependent Variables: Pain (measured by Visual Analog Scale), Functional Disability (assessed via Oswestry Disability Index), Range of Motion (assessed via Goniometer). * Control Variables: Age, Gender, BMI, Baseline Pain/ Disability Scores/ROM The intervention will last 2 weeks with 6 sessions (3 sessions per week). Assessments will be conducted at baseline (Week 1, Pre-treatment) and Post every second session. Data will be analyzed to compare immediate and short-term effects of the two interventions. This study aims to provide evidence for targeted manual therapy approaches in priformis syndrome, potentially guiding clinicians toward the most effective technique for pain reduction, improve ROM and decrease functional disability.

Migraine is one of the primary headache disorders with a high prevalence worldwide, leading to significant disability and reduced quality of life. Trigeminal nerve activation and alterations in central pain processing mechanisms play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Recent studies suggest that migraine may not only be a headache disorder but also a systemic pain disorder associated with changes in central pain processing mechanisms. Central sensitization is defined as increased sensitivity of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to afferent stimuli and is considered a key mechanism in the development and maintenance of chronic pain conditions. This condition is characterized by pain hypersensitivity, allodynia, and generalized pain sensitivity. In addition to headaches, other musculoskeletal pains are also frequently reported in migraine patients. Spinal pain, particularly neck and lower back pain, can occur in migraine sufferers, with central sensitization contributing to the condition, considering the spine as a chain. Large population-based studies have shown a significant association between primary headaches and persistent low back pain, and a higher prevalence of concomitant low back pain has been reported in individuals with chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headaches. This association is suggested to be explained by the shared nociceptive pathways of the head and spinal structures and the changes in central pain processing seen in chronic pain conditions. This relationship between migraine and musculoskeletal pain is also explained by the presence of shared neuroanatomical structures such as the trigemino-cervical complex. Nociceptive afferents from the upper cervical spine and cranial structures converge at the trigemino-cervical complex level in the brainstem, creating a predisposition to the co-occurrence of head and neck pain. This mechanism suggests that pain or dysfunction in the cervical region in migraine patients may be related to headache symptoms. Studies have shown that neck pain is more common in individuals with migraine than in the general population, and research suggests this rate may be approximately 10-12 times higher compared to healthy individuals. Furthermore, it has been reported that individuals with migraine more frequently experience tenderness in cranio-cervical muscles such as the upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, and suboccipital muscles, myofascial trigger points, and increased muscle sensitivity. The literature also emphasizes that these cervical symptoms may be related to migraine frequency, attack severity, and headache-related disability. These findings suggest that migraine should be considered not only as a primary headache disorder but also as a complex neurobiological condition associated with widespread pain sensitivity and musculoskeletal symptoms. A better understanding of the relationship between migraine and musculoskeletal pain could be important for developing multidisciplinary treatment approaches. However, clinical studies in the literature that evaluate migraine, accompanying neck pain, and lower back pain together in terms of common pain mechanisms are quite limited. Therefore, the rationale for this study is that examining factors such as central sensitization, pain threshold, pain catastrophizing, psychological factors, body awareness, and regional disability together in migraine patients can lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine-related musculoskeletal pain. Based on all these reasons and evidence, the aim of this study is to investigate the possible common pain mechanisms and musculoskeletal pathophysiological processes of migraine-related neck and back pain in migraine patients with accompanying neck and/or back pain by evaluating factors such as central sensitization, pain threshold, pain catastrophizing, psychological factors, body awareness, and regional disability together.

This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of a sensorimotor training protocol using a mobilized balance platform device on proprioceptive system function, movement control, balance, physical performance, pain severity, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. A total of 44 patients with chronic low back pain will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a sensorimotor training group or a control group. The intervention group will receive sensorimotor training using the Huber 360 balance system, while the control group will perform a home exercise program including stretching, spinal mobility, lumbopelvic control, and balance exercises. Pain severity, proprioception, functional status, balance, physical performance, and quality of life will be assessed before and after treatment by an assessor blinded to group allocation.

Office workers often suffer from chronic low back pain due to long hours of sitting and poor posture. This study will test whether Baduanjin-a gentle, traditional Chinese exercise-can help reduce pain and improve physical function in office staff with long-standing back pain. Thirty participants will be randomly assigned to either practice Baduanjin for eight weeks or receive no special intervention. Researchers will measure changes in pain levels, movement ability, balance, posture, and daily functioning before and after the program. Baduanjin is a safe, low-cost, and easy-to-learn exercise that could be widely used in community health settings as a non-drug therapy for back pain.

This exploratory, proof-of-concept study is a double-blind (participants and investigators will be blinded), placebo-controlled, randomized, two-arm clinical trial of Marinol \[dronabinol, synthetic Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)\] for chronic low back pain (cLBP) with a 2:1 allocation ratio. Up to 75 subjects will be enrolled in this pilot study and randomized to receive doses of THC (up to 30 mg/day), orally, over 8 weeks. This study will be conducted at a single site; it does not include any stratifications, and there is no interim analysis planned. Notably, the goal is to determine whether there is enough evidence of the safety of THC to support the development of later-phase clinical trials. Thus, detailed developmental plans are contingent on the outcomes of this study.

The purpose of this graduate student research study is to compare the effects of low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFR) and heavy-load training (HLT) in high-volume rowers with mild low back pain or recurrent low back pain (LBP), aiming to determine whether LL-BFR offers a safer yet equally effective alternative to HLT for enhancing performance and reducing risk of re-injury.

This study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive model to estimate the risk of incident onset of five major diseases or conditions: cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, low back pain, and osteoarthritis, in adults aged 30 to 60 years. For each participant, an index date will be defined as the date of a prior health screening or another protocol-defined baseline clinical date. Incident disease status for each target disease or condition will be ascertained by retrospective review of electronic medical records for up to 10 years after the index date. The study integrates retrospective clinical, health screening, laboratory, imaging, and electronic medical record data with prospectively collected biospecimen, proteomic, genomic, questionnaire, lifestyle, and digital health data. Prospective study procedures will be completed over approximately 1 week, with up to 2 additional weeks if needed. By combining multimodal data, this study seeks to improve disease risk prediction and to identify clinical and biological factors associated with disease onset, ultimately supporting personalized risk stratification and preventive healthcare strategies.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and affects a large proportion of working-age individuals. Cortical reorganization in CLBP, particularly within the sensorimotor cortex, has been shown to negatively influence sensory acuity and motor control. The neuroplasticity underlying this reorganization may enhance the effectiveness of sensorimotor retraining therapies that involve specific stimulus features targeting somatosensory cortical regions. This randomized controlled trial will include three groups: a device-assisted sensory acuity training group, a manual sensory acuity training group, and a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy. In this study, device-assisted sensory acuity training will be delivered using a standardized vibrotactile interface that presents controlled stimuli and records participant responses. The intervention will be structured to target sensory acuity components similar to those addressed in manual training. Accordingly, the structured training protocol will include: * localization training to improve detection of stimulus location, * orientation discrimination to identify stimulus direction, * temporal acuity training to distinguish timing differences between tactile stimuli and * graphesthesia training to improve recognition of shapes or letters drawn on the skin through tactile input. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate sensory acuity in individuals with CLBP and to determine the effects of a structured manual and technology-based sensory acuity training program, combined with conventional physiotherapy, on pain intensity (VAS), lumbar two-point discrimination, and a composite sensory acuity score. We hypothesize that adding manual and technology-based structured sensory acuity training (SAT) program to a conventional physiotherapy regimen including motor control exercises will support central nervous system reorganization, improve sensory profiles, and lead to improvements in pain-related variables, disability, and quality of life. Through this structured SAT program, we aim to provide an approach that evaluates and trains multiple dimensions of sensory acuity in CLBP, including localization, orientation, and temporal discrimination.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if catgut embedding works to treat chronic low back pain in adults with lumbar spondylosis and "Blood Stasis" syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does catgut embedding lower back pain more effectively than electro-acupuncture? Does catgut embedding improve the daily physical activities of participants? Researchers will compare catgut embedding to electro-acupuncture to see which method works better to reduce pain and improve quality of life. All participants will also receive counseling on lifestyle changes and back exercises. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either catgut embedding (2 sessions over 4 weeks) or electro-acupuncture (20 sessions over 4 weeks). Visit the clinic for treatments and checkups. Complete surveys about their pain levels and ability to perform daily tasks at the start, at 2 weeks, and at 4 weeks.